Search

What are you looking for?

Enter at least 3 characters or an abbreviation, such as AI, BI, or HR.

Home › Data & BI › Process reporting
Business process reporting

See where the process loses time and what to improve first

The BI report combines data from AMODIT or another BPM and document workflow system. It shows process health, deadlines, stage duration, rework, workload, and bottlenecks. Instead of only signaling a problem, it provides a path to locate it, diagnose it, and decide what action to take.

Process report summary showing case volume, completion time, rework, bottleneck ranking, and alerts in a Polish-language interface
Management view of the process: signals about timeliness, rework, and bottlenecks. Sample data; the interface is in Polish.
Any processInvoices, complaints, orders, HR, approvals, and other workflows
Any BPM systemAMODIT and other process and document workflow systems
Client’s BIPower BI, Tableau, Qlik, or another selected tool
Before → After

From case statuses to a view of the entire process

A process system records every step, but a daily case list does not always show where work slows down or why. The BI layer organizes process history around the questions asked by the person accountable for the outcome.

BeforeAfter
Statuses are visible, but assessing the health of the entire process is difficult.One view combines volume, timeliness, completion time, rework, and the most important alerts.
The average looks acceptable even though some cases have been waiting too long.Aging and the time distribution reveal the long tail and cases requiring action.
Cases are known to return, but no one knows between which stages.Transition analysis shows where work is repeated and which path should be investigated.
A high level of manual work is automatically treated as a problem.Prioritization considers volume, delays, and complexity together, distinguishing necessary handling from a strong candidate for automation.
From signal to action

The report guides users through successive questions about the process

Each view has a role in the analysis. First, it detects a variance. Then it identifies the location and possible cause. Finally, it indicates the area where action should be taken.

01 · Signal

Does the process require attention?

The summary combines case volume, the share of closed cases, completion time, breaches of an agreed threshold, rework, and the largest bottleneck. Changing the period or status recalculates the view within one context.

Timeliness and case duration report showing aging, backlog, oldest statuses, and an anonymous list of cases requiring action in a Polish-language interface
Signal: aging and a list of cases requiring action. Sample data; the interface is in Polish.
Process bottleneck ranking showing stage duration, volume, and a table of detailed metrics in a Polish-language interface
Location: stages ranked by their impact on the process. Sample data; the interface is in Polish.
02 · Location

At which stage are we losing time?

The report breaks the process into stages and compares their duration, median, maximum, number of active stages, and volume. The ranking helps distinguish isolated exceptions from a problem in the design of a stage.

03 · Diagnosis

What may be causing the problem?

Rework analysis shows the stages between which cases return most often. Workload views show how work is distributed and allow it to be compared with rework and delays. The result supports process and team capacity analysis, not automatic employee evaluation.

Rework analysis showing transitions between statuses, a trend, and an anonymous case list in a Polish-language interface
Diagnosis: transitions where work is repeated. Sample data; the interface is in Polish.
Automation potential report showing a business unit ranking and a map of manual work volume and document complexity in a Polish-language interface
Action: ranking of candidates for improvement or automation. Sample data; the interface is in Polish.
04 · Action

What should be improved or automated first?

Priority does not come from the share of manual work alone. The report combines volume, delay, complexity, and manual work to identify candidates for further analysis. The process owner decides the order of changes.

Views and metrics

Processes and documents in one analytical model

We select the scope for the business question and the data available in the system. The demo confirms the following groups of analyses.

Process health

Volume, status, and timeliness

Number of cases or documents, share closed, aging, breaches of the agreed completion time (SLA), backlog, and trends.

Process flow

Working time, waiting time, and stages

Average, median, and maximum case or stage duration, active stages, time distribution, and a bottleneck ranking.

Process quality

Rework and corrections

Number and share of cases with rework, transitions between stages, the rework trend, and a list of anonymous case identifiers for analysis.

Team

Workload and work distribution

Volume assigned to users, handling time, and backlog. We interpret these together with portfolio size and complexity.

Documents

Manual work and complexity

Share of manual and automated handling, number of line items, document type and value, delay, and complexity index.

Priorities

Improvement potential

A ranking of business units or document types based on a combination of scale, manual work, delay, and complexity.

Document report summary showing volume over time, posting methods, business units, and timeliness in a Polish-language interface
Document workflow and timeliness summary. Sample data; the interface is in Polish.
Manual and automated work report showing a trend, business unit comparison, and a table of areas for analysis in a Polish-language interface
Share of manual and automated work by period and business unit. Sample data; the interface is in Polish.
Who it is for

Each role sees the process at the right level

One data model answers operational and management questions without requiring a separate report for every business unit.

Process owner

Where to change the workflow

A view of stage duration, rework, and bottlenecks identifies the part of the process that should be redesigned.

Operations manager

Where action is needed

Backlog, workload, and cases exceeding the agreed threshold determine the team’s work priorities.

Management

Which problem has the greatest impact

The process summary and priority ranking support decisions about organizational changes, automation, and the order of investments.

Systems and technology

AMODIT, another BPM system, and the client’s chosen BI tool

The sample report was built in Power BI using data from AMODIT. We apply the same analytical approach to data from any BPM or document workflow system. We build the reporting layer in Power BI, Tableau, Qlik, or another tool used by the client.

Process source

AMODIT

We combine knowledge of the platform, process configuration, and data with the BI team’s expertise. The report expands the analytics of a production AMODIT implementation.

Process source

Another BPM or document workflow system

We start with available data about cases, stages, statuses, time, and accountability. We determine the data extraction method after analyzing the system.

Analytics layer

Technology matched to the environment

The solution does not depend on Power BI. Tool selection accounts for existing licenses, architecture, security, users, and the maintenance model.

How we implement

Questions and decisions first, then the dashboard

The report scope follows from the process, available data, and the decisions it needs to support. We do not start with a list of charts.

  1. 01Questions

    We identify the users, problems, and decisions the report needs to support.

  2. 02Data

    We review the history of cases, stages, and statuses and the available connection method.

  3. 03Metrics

    We agree on definitions of duration, rework, bottlenecks, and timeliness thresholds.

  4. 04Report

    We build views from summary to diagnosis in the tool selected by the client.

  5. 05Validation

    We compare results with the source, test filters, and review the report with users.

  6. 06Development

    After launch, we develop metrics and views as the process changes.

First step

Choose one process and one question the current statuses cannot answer. Based on that, we will review the data, propose the first report scope, and identify what needs to be agreed before pricing.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about process reporting

What is business process reporting in BI?

It is an analysis of data about the flow of cases and documents from a process system. The report combines information about volume, statuses, time, timeliness, rework, stages, and workload to identify areas requiring further analysis or action.

Does the solution work only with AMODIT?

No. AMODIT is the data source in the example shown, but we connect the BI layer to any BPM or document workflow system. We select the data extraction method for the system architecture.

Does the report have to be built in Power BI?

No. The demo was prepared in Power BI, but the report can be built in Tableau, Qlik, or another tool selected by the client. The choice depends on the existing environment, licenses, users, security, and maintenance model.

Which processes can be analyzed?

The same pattern applies to invoices, complaints, tickets, orders, HR processes, document approvals, and other workflows, provided the system records the data required for the agreed metrics.

Will the report show an individual case?

We select the level of detail for the available data, permissions, and report purpose. The sample report includes lists of anonymous case identifiers and navigation between views. During system analysis, we determine how users will access the source record.

How do you define SLA thresholds and bottlenecks?

We agree on the completion-time threshold with the process owner. We design bottleneck metrics based on the available data and the business significance of each stage. We do not treat the sample threshold in the demo as a universal SLA.

Is the report used to evaluate employees?

Its purpose is to analyze the process and workload distribution. A user’s result must be interpreted together with the volume and complexity of the cases handled. The report alone does not automatically determine the effectiveness of a specific person.

Where should we start?

Start with one process, one business question, and one person accountable for the outcome. We then review what data the system records and which definitions must be agreed before the first view is built.

Process reporting

Identify a process where the status does not explain the problem.

We will review the available data and translate it into the first report scope.

Describe your challenge